Ignoring inappropriate reviews

Implementing a suggestion from Tom Pfeifer, chairs can now mark completed reviews as inactive. Such reviews are not tallied for computing score averages and are not returned to the author in the decision email. They are shown on the paper page with a light gray background. Marking reviews as inactive can be useful when the review is not considered appropriate or helpful, e.g., because the reviewer scores the paper based on the belief that it falls outside the conference scope or the review is considered to show a lack of technical judgement or professionalism.

You can mark a review as inactive by unsetting the checkbox  "Review is included in score computation and sent to author" when editing the review status (e.g., by clicking on "Completed".)

Popular posts from this blog

Certificates for Authors and Presenters

Image
Conferences can now upload PDF backgrounds and generate presenter and author certificates. Each author or presenter can download their certificate from the paper page, by clicking on the icon next to the (bio) label. The certificate can include the author or presenter name and the paper title. Certificates for attendees and reviewers will be added on request.
Read more

Equations in paper titles, abstracts and reviews

EDAS now implements MathJAX, so that all elements, such as paper titles, abstracts and review text, can contain LaTeX equations and symbols. Only \(...\) for inline math and \[...\] for display math are recognized since the dollar sign would trigger too many erroneous renderings when dollars as monetary units are meant instead of math.
Read more

Conference-defined paper status

Instead of defining a pre-defined list of paper status values such as "accepted" or "minor revision", EDAS now allows conferences to create new paper status values. These can be used for special handling or, say, distinguishing posters from oral presentations. (However, in many cases, paper categories and tracks are likely to be better choices.) New paper status options can be defined in Conference:Configure . Each can define its own background color and long text label. Each status value defines the paper as being active (i.e., under submission or review), accepted, rejected or withdrawn. By default, new EDAS conferences start with the common status values of pending, active, withdrawn, accepted and rejected that are used for almost every conference or journal. Paper status values were embedded in many of the hundreds of EDAS functions, so there may be some odd behaviors until all the corner cases have been generalized to handle conference-defined status values.
Read more